funsec mailing list archives
Re: Mutually Assured DDoS
From: "Alex Lanstein" <ALanstein () FireEye com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 14:22:49 -0700
Idiocy. - - ferg
Which part are you against? The "botnet" angle or the NetA initiative all together? I don't see any reason our military shouldn't research that angle of warfare... anything to keep our guys from getting killed out there is good in my book. Alex _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS, (continued)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS der Mouse (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Tomas L. Byrnes (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS der Mouse (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Rich Kulawiec (May 04)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Gadi Evron (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Barry Raveendran Greene (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Rich Kulawiec (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS nameless (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Alex Lanstein (May 01)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Paul Ferguson (May 01)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Paul M. Moriarty (May 01)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Paul Ferguson (May 01)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Larry Seltzer (May 01)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Valdis . Kletnieks (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Cory Smith (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Valdis . Kletnieks (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Gadi Evron (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Paul Ferguson (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Tomas L. Byrnes (May 03)