funsec mailing list archives
Re: Mutually Assured DDoS
From: der Mouse <mouse () rodents-montreal org>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 14:45:50 -0400 (EDT)
And I disagree that offense, especially as a counterpunch, is something that is off-limit to respectable actors. If I can detect and own a botnet that is attacking me, and reverse it on its herders, I think that is a highly respectable thing to do.
I disagree. Botnets are always (to a first and probably even second approximation) made up of machines belonging to arm's-length third parties, and you have no more right to abuse them for your ends than those abusing them to attack you do. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mouse () rodents-montreal org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS, (continued)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Paul M. Moriarty (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Rich Kulawiec (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Tomas L. Byrnes (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Gadi Evron (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Tomas L. Byrnes (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Valdis . Kletnieks (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Gary Warner (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Gadi Evron (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Larry Seltzer (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Tomas L. Byrnes (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS der Mouse (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Tomas L. Byrnes (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS der Mouse (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Rich Kulawiec (May 04)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Gadi Evron (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Barry Raveendran Greene (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Rich Kulawiec (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS nameless (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Alex Lanstein (May 01)