funsec mailing list archives
Re: Mutually Assured DDoS
From: "Paul M. Moriarty" <pmm () igtc com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 14:42:36 -0700
The "botnet as a weapon" genie is already out of the bottle. Why shouldn't the military have one too? - Paul - On May 1, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Alex Lanstein wrote:
Idiocy. - - fergWhich part are you against? The "botnet" angle or the NetA initiative all together? I don't see any reason our military shouldn't research that angle of warfare... anything to keep our guys from getting killed out there is good in my book. Alex
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS, (continued)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS der Mouse (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Rich Kulawiec (May 04)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Gadi Evron (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Barry Raveendran Greene (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Rich Kulawiec (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS nameless (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Alex Lanstein (May 01)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Paul Ferguson (May 01)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Paul M. Moriarty (May 01)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Paul Ferguson (May 01)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Larry Seltzer (May 01)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Valdis . Kletnieks (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Cory Smith (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Valdis . Kletnieks (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Gadi Evron (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Paul Ferguson (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Tomas L. Byrnes (May 03)