Security Basics mailing list archives

Re: RE: Wireless Security (Part 2)


From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <bugtraq () planetcobalt net>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 13:36:47 +0200

On 2006-05-23 Lloydm wrote:
All of these issues are FINALLY no longer issues with the soon to be
"officially" release system from www.kmdo.com.  100% security,
guaranteed! 

What a big load of bullshit.

Not only you have to entrust your entire communication to one company,
this company also uses propietary technology so you can never be sure
*how* secure this really is. Why does this use proprietary, "bleeding-
edge" technology instead of established, well-tested and known secure
technology? When it comes to security, bleeding-edge is *always* a bad
idea, because it cannot be tested well enough (otherwise it wouldn't be
bleeding-edge).

In addition to that the system accepts mail only from previously
approved addresses, meaning that you will practically devoid yourself of
Internet mail (how is a potential customer going to contact you?), which
is - as I might add - something that can be easily set up by oneself
with a whitelisting spam filter.

I really don't need this kind of spam on the list.

Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
-- 
"If you think technology can solve your security problems, then you
don't understand the problems and you don't understand the technology."
--Bruce Schneier


Current thread: