Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: WIRELESS THEFT
From: ONEILL David J <David.J.Oneill () state or us>
Date: 18 Oct 2002 15:30:44 -0700
A M E N ! David J. O'Neill NEDSS - IS7 Parkway Bldg., 2nd Floor Phone: (503) 378-2101 ext. 364 FAX: (503) 378-2102
mdresser () windsormachine com 10/18/02 02:57PM >>>
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Alaric Darconville wrote:
Receiving the signal itself is not the problem-- it's the broadcasting back into that network that is the problem. You can passively receive all the signal you want without having to do a thing about it, but in order to make use of that signal you will have to actively communicate with that network. There's where they could "get you."
What about the FCC rules under Class 15 A and B, stating that the device(their access point) must accept any interference, etc, etc? Your wireless card just happens to radiate "interference" in a highly coherent pattern. The wireless frequency falls into the unlicensed spectrum after all. :D Mike
Current thread:
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT, (continued)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT Jeff Knox (Oct 21)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT Alaric Darconville (Oct 22)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT Raoul Armfield (Oct 22)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT Alaric Darconville (Oct 23)
- Cisco PIX - Anti Spoof - ip verify reverse -path McKenzie Family (Oct 21)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT David (Oct 21)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT Jason Kohles (Oct 22)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT Jay DeSotel (Oct 22)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT Stevie A. Jones (Oct 22)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT ATD (Oct 23)
- Re: WIRELESS THEFT Shaolin Tiger (Oct 24)
- Re: WIRELESS THEFT Meritt James (Oct 25)