Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Older BeroFTPD glob
From: "Eduardo Cruz" <eduardo.cruz () tsg com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 02:52:18 +0100
I see a bit of non-good feelings in this message, anyway Colors exist because people preffers one or another, if i took my own "good-feelings" on using beroftpd is because i find it very good (thanks to anyone that took part on the develop and u 2 of course) So as bugs come up ill keep fixing them on the bero's i use. And and i will not mind about sharing with the comunity a solution for a problem. (as i did on my last post attaching the glob.c fixed). "People that helps people = good stuff" "People that blame people for helping out people = not good" Again as colors exist, anyone can choose the one he likes. Best regards, Edu. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bernhard Rosenkraenzer" <bero () redhat de> To: "Eduardo Cruz" <eduardo.cruz () tsg com> Cc: "KF" <dotslash () snosoft com>; <vuln-dev () security-focus com> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:05 AM Subject: Re: Older BeroFTPD glob
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, Eduardo Cruz wrote:just patch glob.c ur self, or use the mine already patched (attached). And about the maintenance of beroftp, as far as i know is not being done since years ago.I've stopped maintaining it when wu-ftpd moved to an open development model back in the days of 2.5.0 (even announced it). The current version of beroftpd IS wu-ftpd. There's no point in maintaining a fork once the project you forked accepts (your) patches. LLaP bero
Current thread:
- Older BeroFTPD glob KF (Dec 09)
- Re: Older BeroFTPD glob Eduardo Cruz (Dec 09)
- Re: Older BeroFTPD glob Bernhard Rosenkraenzer (Dec 09)
- Re: Older BeroFTPD glob Eduardo Cruz (Dec 10)
- Re: Older BeroFTPD glob Bernhard Rosenkraenzer (Dec 10)
- Re: Older BeroFTPD glob Bernhard Rosenkraenzer (Dec 09)
- Re: Older BeroFTPD glob Eduardo Cruz (Dec 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- re: Older BeroFTPD glob KF (Dec 09)
- Re: Older BeroFTPD glob Eduardo Cruz (Dec 10)