Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Consulting lameness, RE: Information on Raptor
From: BGrubin () SCIENT COM (Ben Grubin)
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:47:02 -0800
Argh. This sucks, so I have to comment. You are at least as bad by saying it is one of the best choices--and not backing it up, as the other "evil consultants" are by saying various vendors' products are flawed in some fundamental way, with equally little justification. Most security consultants seem to have found out that the best way to ingratiate themselves with customers is to levy opinions that the customers do not have the depth of knowledge to understand, and therefore appear that the opinion is in fact correct (and supported) by virtue of the customer not being able to ask the right questions. The truth of the matter is these same consultants rarely have the depth to understand the opinion they are levying anyhow. It's a total farce. Cheers, Ben --- Benjamin P. Grubin / bgrubin () scient com - PGP key available Infrastructure/Security Architect / mobile (617) 513-5978 fax (617) 585-3230 Scient -- Be Legendary / http://www.scient.com/ ticker://SCNT
-----Original Message----- From: Marcelo Amaral - ALTAVISTA.NET [mailto:marcelo.amaral () ALTAVISTA NET] Sent: Monday, February 21, 2000 3:22 PM To: VULN-DEV () SECURITYFOCUS COM Subject: Re: Information on Raptor I agree that these consultants are so unprofessional. Axent Raptor is, today, one of the best choice in Firewall Systems. By the way, a Firewall's bad configuration may cause vulnerability. Maybe the problem, in this case, isn't hardware or software, but peopleware (the consultants). regards Marcelo Amaral, marcelo.amaral () altavista net Network Consultant -----Original Message----- From: Yiorgos Adamopoulos [SMTP:adamo () DBLAB ECE NTUA GR] Sent: Monday, February 21, 2000 12:19 PM To: VULN-DEV () SECURITYFOCUS COM Subject: Re: Information on Raptor On Sun, 20 Feb 2000 15:23:02 -0500 Martin M Samson <marti () VIDEOTRON CA> wrote:We've been told (by consultants) that this type of firewall has many flaws.Assuming you have paid the above consultants to do an evaluation for you, it is their responsibility to tell you what the flaws are. In any other case they are simply irresponsible. I have not used Raptor in my life, but having a "consultant" say this to a customer without backing up / demonstrating the claim is very unprofessionalistic -- Yiorgos Adamopoulos, adamo () ieee org
Current thread:
- Information on Raptor Martin M Samson (Feb 20)
- Re: Information on Raptor Yiorgos Adamopoulos (Feb 21)
- (Fwd) Re: vulnerability database Felix Harris (Feb 21)
- Re: Information on Raptor Malikai (Feb 21)
- Re: Information on Raptor James Crooks (Feb 22)
- Re: Information on Raptor Malikai (Feb 23)
- Consulting lameness, RE: Information on Raptor Ben Grubin (Feb 23)
- Single SignOn Vanna P. Rella (Feb 23)
- Re: Single SignOn Simple Nomad (Feb 24)
- Re: Information on Raptor James Crooks (Feb 22)
- office 2k security bug? Torgeir Hansen (Feb 22)
- R: office 2k security bug? Raistlin (Feb 23)
- Fwd: ANNOUNCEMENT: Lighting Firewall for Linux released Grzegorz Stelmaszek (Feb 23)
- Re: Information on Raptor James Crooks (Feb 21)
- Re: Information on Raptor David J Laumann (Feb 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Information on Raptor Marcelo Amaral - ALTAVISTA.NET (Feb 21)
- Re: Information on Raptor CL: Nelson, Jeff (Feb 24)
- Re: Information on Raptor IC&S - Eelco van Beek (Feb 25)