Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: network appliance...
From: mrousseau () SECURED ORG (Maxime Rousseau)
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 03:25:16 -0400
Its probly less secure then you think, or as the vendor thinks :) This looks like a case of a less distributed OS that dosent have much known vulnerabilities but alot to discover. My advice is to inspect this closely and possibly submit the system to some automated standard buffer overflow checking program. I am also interested in knowing what kind of can function in a network with no open ports. Maybe the nmap was flawed? Maybe it works only in UDP? Maybe its vulnerable to network sniffing/highjacking? Does it rely on obscurity of a closed source network code to be secure, or is it really? Those are all questions that i would have answered before i buy any new system. Have fun, M. Secured Industries Why fear the unknown?
-----Original Message----- From: JT Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 11:16 PM has anyone heard of vulnerabilities in the Network Appliance base operating
systems?
Current thread:
- network appliance... JT (Apr 10)
- Re: network appliance... Maxime Rousseau (Apr 12)
- Re: network appliance... Olle Segerdahl (Apr 12)
- Re: network appliance... nine (Apr 12)
- Re: network appliance... Todd Garrison (Apr 12)
- Re: network appliance... Dustin D. Trammell (Apr 12)
- Re: network appliance... Ryan Permeh (Apr 12)
- Re: network appliance... Jordan Ritter (Apr 12)
- Re: network appliance... Tom (Apr 12)
- Re: network appliance... Luiz Eduardo Gava (Apr 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: network appliance... Lopez, Joe (Apr 12)
- Re: network appliance... Dom De Vitto (Apr 12)
(Thread continues...)