Snort mailing list archives
Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody?
From: NA <dustypath () comcast net>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 07:10:52 -0700
On 3/21/11 4:12 PM, waldo kitty wrote:
On 3/21/2011 15:23, Matthew Jonkman wrote:But fork and re-sid makes it tough for folks to combine the open ruleset with VRT. That'd be easiest for us long term, but doesn't make it easy for us to do the no-gpl rulesets. If folks are happy with not being able to easily combine with VRT then we can go that direction.please see my earlier response RE: everyone carry the GPL in a special rules set file so that those who want to include it in their operations can enable it in their configs and everyone else can (leave them) disable(d) in their's...
After reading this thread for the last 4 days this suggestion makes the most sense. With this idea there could even be two sets of GPL rules. A user could enable one or the other, or neither. My opinion is that of someone new to Snort, still tuning (still learning to tune!), and rules are something I depend on, not attempt to write yet. You could though easily equate my situation with a rushed admin. .02 Bill B NA=noob advocate? ;-)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody?, (continued)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Matthew Jonkman (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them?Nobody? Weir, Jason (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Jason Wallace (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them?Nobody? Weir, Jason (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Jeff Kell (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Matthew Jonkman (Mar 22)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Jason Wallace (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Jason Brvenik (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Joel Esler (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? waldo kitty (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? NA (Mar 22)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Mike Lococo (Mar 23)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Matthew Jonkman (Mar 22)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Joel Esler (Mar 21)