Snort mailing list archives
Re: Licensing
From: Bob Walder <bwalder () spamcop net>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 09:03:50 +0100
Matt makes some excellent points. Sourcefire has put a lot of resource behind cleaning up the Snort rules and, in all honesty, I doubt that ANY other commercial organisation would be prepared to give those rules away for free at all - go on, ask the other major IDS/IPS vendors if you can have access to their signature libraries, even 5 days after they have released them to their paying customers. They would laugh in your face. The community rules continue to be free and freely available. That is all you can realistically expect for what you are "paying" for Snort. As someone else said in this forum recently, if you are upset about this latest announcement, you should ask for your money back.... It would not surprise or upset me if Sourcefire eventually decided to keep its VRT rule set to itself - that is what other vendors do right now. Why SHOULD they give their work away for free? Before you flame me for that, please note that I am ONLY talking about their own rules here, developed in house, NOT the open source elements of Snort. For the moment, Marty and Sourcefire continue to be overly generous IMHO Bob Walder The NSS Group www.nss.co.uk On 8/3/05 2:03 am, "Matt Kettler" <mkettler () evi-inc com> wrote:
At 06:07 PM 3/7/2005, Rowland, Krisa W ERDC-ITL-MS Contractor wrote:Ok. I know I haven¹t read all the hoopla and complaining about this new licensing but this means that if we want the VRT rules we have to pay? Sorry for being slowOnly if you want them as fast as the normal Sourcefire customers get them, or if you want to rebundle them in a commercial product. See Marty's post with Message ID: 45cfecfcfb7c474d58e180f5d9344bcd () sourcefire com AFAIK the VRT rules have always been available to SF customers before the OSS side gets them. Fresher updates from VRT has been a selling point of SF boxes for years. Now you can opt to subscribe to the faster updates for a fee without having to buy a SF box.. Sounds good to me. As for the rebundlers, well, I'd hate to compete with someone who's simply sponging all my resources for free... They're also still free to use all the snort code, even SF's contributions to the snort code, and the community/bleeding rules in their commercial products. I think they're being quite reasonable, as the changes only apply to the VRT rules. I'm pleased they're willing to give us their VRT rules for free at all. Of course, if they ever did anything as unlikely as to try to subvert the code, I'd show up on their doorstep to deliver a letter berating them for the act, but I doubt Marty and co. will ever do such a thing. SF may not be perfect people, but they seem to be Good People, and their continued contributions to a free Snort are solid evidence of that. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Licensing Rowland, Krisa W ERDC-ITL-MS Contractor (Mar 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Licensing Matt Kettler (Mar 07)
- Re: Licensing Peter J Manis (Mar 07)
- Re: Licensing Matt Kettler (Mar 08)
- Re: Licensing Bob Walder (Mar 08)
- Re: Licensing Matt Kettler (Mar 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Licensing Martin Roesch (Mar 07)
- Re: Licensing Peter J Manis (Mar 07)
- Re: Licensing Martin Roesch (Mar 08)
- Re: Licensing Florin Andrei (Mar 07)
- RE: Licensing Lee Clemens (Mar 07)
- Re: Licensing Martin Roesch (Mar 08)
- Re: Licensing Peter J Manis (Mar 07)
- Re: Licensing Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez (Mar 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Licensing SRH-Lists (Mar 08)
- RE: Licensing Snort (Mar 08)