Secure Coding mailing list archives
Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection
From: ljknews at mac.com (ljknews)
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:03:23 -0500
At 9:14 AM -0500 12/14/05, Gary McGraw wrote:
No, that's a copy of stackguard. The real problem with all of these approaches is that they don't fix the root problem. Finding and removing buffer overflow conditions with a static analysis tool is far superior.
But still better is using a programming language that does not allow buffer overflows. -- Larry Kilgallen
Current thread:
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection, (continued)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection ljknews (Dec 13)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection David Eisner (Dec 13)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection Greenarrow 1 (Dec 13)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection Steven M. Bellovin (Dec 13)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection Michael S Hines (Dec 13)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection mudge (Dec 13)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection Crispin Cowan (Dec 14)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection ljknews (Dec 14)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection Michael S Hines (Dec 14)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection Michael S Hines (Dec 13)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection ljknews (Dec 14)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection Chris Wysopal (Dec 14)