Secure Coding mailing list archives
Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection
From: mshines at purdue.edu (Michael S Hines)
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:19:12 -0500
Doesn't a hardware 'feature' such as this lock software into a two-state model (user/priv)? Who's to say that model is the best? Will that be the model of the future? Wouldn't a two-state software model that works be more effective? It's easier to change (patch) software than to rewire hardware (figuratively speaking). Just wondering... Mike Hines ----------------------------------- Michael S Hines mshines at purdue.edu
Current thread:
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection Kenneth R. van Wyk (Dec 13)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection ljknews (Dec 13)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection Gadi Evron (Dec 13)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection Ron Forrester (Dec 13)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection ljknews (Dec 13)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection David Eisner (Dec 13)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection Greenarrow 1 (Dec 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection Steven M. Bellovin (Dec 13)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection Michael S Hines (Dec 13)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection mudge (Dec 13)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection Crispin Cowan (Dec 14)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection ljknews (Dec 14)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection Michael S Hines (Dec 14)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection Michael S Hines (Dec 13)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection ljknews (Dec 13)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection ljknews (Dec 14)
- Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection Chris Wysopal (Dec 14)