Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: Nmap SoC Ideas?


From: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:29:38 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/14/2010 06:47 AM, Daniel Roethlisberger wrote:
It's already part of the Feature Creepers and Bug Wranglers
description, but I'd prioritize full IPv6 support for all scan
types, which AFAIR includes IPv6 raw socket portability issues.
Also, it might make sense to think of clever ways to guess used
IPv6 addresses within a network, since with IPv6, exhaustive
scanning of networks is infeasible.


Yes, it would be great to finally have this.  I have another idea which isn't
totally dependent on this but would be go with it quite nicely.  I don't
recall it being brought up before: remove the -6 option and allow mixed IPv4
and IPv6 scanning in one session.  Split host batches up between the two just
like is already done for directly-connected hosts and not.  Sure there is more
to it than that with all of o.af() stuff going on and with target parsing, but
you get the gist of it.  This would be awesome.

Cheers,
Kris Katterjohn

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=cEOf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/


Current thread: