Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences?

[Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>]

On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 15:45, Benny Lyne Amorsen
<benny+usenet () amorsen dk> wrote:

> Juniper's solution will cause way too much packet reordering for TCP to
> handle. I am arguing that strict round-robin load balancing will
> function better than hash-based in a lot of real-world
> scenarios.

And you will be wrong. Packet arriving out of order, will be
considered previous packet lost by host, and host will signal need for
resend.

-- 
  ++ytti