Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences?

[Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf () gmail com>]

It was intended to detect congestion. The obvious response was in some way to pace the sender(s) so that it was 
alleviated.

Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways...

> On Sep 7, 2023, at 11:19 PM, Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote:
>
> 
>
> > On 9/7/23 09:51, Saku Ytti wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps if congestion control used latency or FEC instead of loss, we
> > could tolerate reordering while not underperforming under loss, but
> > I'm sure in decades following that decision we'd learn new ways how we
> > don't understand any of this.
>
> Isn't this partly what ECN was meant for? It's so old I barely remember what it was meant to solve :-).
>
> Mark.