nanog mailing list archives
Re: Rogers Outage Canada
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:41:25 +0200
* victor () jvknet com (Victor Kuarsingh) [Mon 11 Jul 2022, 17:17 CEST]:
This is the most they can and will say. For liabilities reasons, specifics are likely not in the cards.
I doubt it. Given that emergency services were impacted you can count on a proper assessment being made available to a parliamentary inquiry. Too much broke to cover this up any further.
-- Niels.
Current thread:
- Re: Rogers Outage Canada, (continued)
- Re: Rogers Outage Canada Eric Kuhnke (Jul 09)
- Re: Rogers Outage Canada L F (Jul 09)
- Re: Rogers Outage Canada Victor Kuarsingh (Jul 09)
- Re: Rogers Outage Canada Alain Hebert (Jul 11)
- Re: Rogers Outage Canada L F (Jul 10)
- Re: Rogers Outage Canada Jon Sands (Jul 11)
- Re: Rogers Outage Canada Shane Ronan (Jul 11)
- Re: Rogers Outage Canada Victor Kuarsingh (Jul 11)
- Re: Rogers Outage Canada Keith Stokes (Jul 11)
- Re: Rogers Outage Canada Jared Mauch (Jul 11)
- Re: Rogers Outage Canada Niels Bakker (Jul 11)
- Re: Rogers Outage Canada Andrey Kostin (Jul 11)
- Assumptions about network designs... Matthew Petach (Jul 11)
- Re: Assumptions about network designs... sronan (Jul 11)
- Re: Assumptions about network designs... Andrey Kostin (Jul 12)
- Re: Rogers Outage Canada L F (Jul 11)
- Re: Rogers Outage Canada L F (Jul 11)
- Re: Rogers Outage Canada Andrew Paolucci via NANOG (Jul 11)
- Re: Rogers Outage Canada Snowmobile2004 (Jul 11)
- Re: Rogers Outage Canada Pete Baldwin - TCC (Jul 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Rogers Outage Canada Clayton Zekelman (Jul 08)