nanog mailing list archives
RE: SRv6
From: "Keith Medcalf" <kmedcalf () dessus com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 23:24:45 -0600
On Monday, 21 September, 2020 16:16, Randy Bush wrote:
I'm not sure what you're saying here, I never said MPLS VPNs are secure, only private. I hope others recognise that they are different concepts.
yes, privacy is one aspect of security. and, as mpls vns are not private sans encryption, they are not secure.
That is blatantly untrue. I have an MPLS VPN running from my Living Room to my Bathroom. It is not encrypted. It is protected with 3G security (Guards, Guns, Gates). You do not need "encryption" in order to be "secure". -- Be decisive. Make a decision, right or wrong. The road of life is paved with flat squirrels who could not make a decision.
Current thread:
- Re: SRv6, (continued)
- Re: SRv6 Randy Bush (Sep 21)
- RE: SRv6 Keith Medcalf (Sep 21)
- Re: SRv6 Paul Timmins (Sep 22)
- Re: SRv6 Tom Hill (Sep 15)
- RE: SRv6 aaron1 (Sep 15)
- Re: SRv6 Tom Hill (Sep 16)
- Re: SRv6 Andrey Kostin (Sep 18)
- Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 16)
- Re: SRv6 Ćukasz Bromirski (Sep 16)
- Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 17)
- Re: SRv6 James W. Laferriere (Sep 15)
- Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 16)