nanog mailing list archives

Re: SRv6


From: "James W. Laferriere" <babydr () baby-dragons com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:57:44 -0800 (AKDT)

        Hello All ,

On Tue, 15 Sep 2020, Mark Tinka wrote:

On 15/Sep/20 11:53, Saku Ytti wrote:

I think SRv6 is an
abomination, it is complex SW, and very complex HW, because it exists.
We pay the premium to add HW support for it.

And that is what the vendor(s) pushing this hope operators "realize"...
that SRv6 is a complex mess that needs some kind of centralized system
to manage. But wait, the centralized system is, itself, quite complex
that no operator would dare spend time installing, commissioning or
maintaining it themselves.

So what ever shall we do, as operators?

Simple, pay the vendor(s) to take care of all of it for you... planning,
design, spec'ing, bill of materials, deployment, operation and refresh
programs... lock that vendor top and bottom line in for them for the
next 10 years, while they find some other RFC to create in order to keep
the cycle going 11 years later.

Mark.

So then here we are back at the older days of hard wired devices configured on site by vendor 'X' to do what buyer 'Y' was told it would do . And Buyer 'Y' is still wondering WHEN it will be that kitchen sink it ordered .

                Twyl ,  JimL

--
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| James   W.   Laferriere    | System    Techniques | Give me VMS     |
| Network & System Engineer  | 3237     Holden Road |  Give me Linux  |
| jiml () system-techniques com | Fairbanks, AK. 99709 |   only  on  AXP |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+


Current thread: