nanog mailing list archives
Re: SRv6
From: Greg Shepherd <gjshep () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:06:08 -0700
Call me old, but I miss the days when this thread was still on the SRv6 rails. Can we get back the proper bashing to match this thread title? -Shep
On Sep 21, 2020, at 13:54, James Bensley <jwbensley+nanog () gmail com> wrote: On 19 September 2020 03:23:15 BST, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:Information can be in plaintext and privateThree can keep a secret, if two of them are dead. -- franklin i know you truely believe the tunnel k00laid. the security community does not.Hi Randy, I'm not sure what you're saying here, I never said MPLS VPNs are secure, only private. I hope others recognise that they are different concepts. Cheers, James.
Current thread:
- Re: SRv6, (continued)
- Re: SRv6 Randy Bush (Sep 21)
- RE: SRv6 Keith Medcalf (Sep 21)
- Re: SRv6 Paul Timmins (Sep 22)
- Re: SRv6 Tom Hill (Sep 15)
- RE: SRv6 aaron1 (Sep 15)
- Re: SRv6 Tom Hill (Sep 16)
- Re: SRv6 Andrey Kostin (Sep 18)
- Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 16)