nanog mailing list archives
Re: SRv6
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:32:03 +0200
On 15/Sep/20 19:00, aaron1 () gvtc com wrote:
Sorry guys, I'm not aware of much of what you mention as far as agenda, vendor motive, and hardware support, etc....
I'm not shy... this would be Cisco. And somehow, they've managed to "convince" other vendors to go down this rabbit hole, because it is seemingly clear that network operators (especially mobile providers) may actually buy this cockamamie. Mark.