nanog mailing list archives
Re: SRv6
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:13:12 +0200
On 22/Sep/20 00:06, Greg Shepherd wrote:
Call me old, but I miss the days when this thread was still on the SRv6 rails. Can we get back the proper bashing to match this thread title?
Probably not off-topic, since vendors may push SRv6 as a(n) (MPLS) VPN replacement and new money-maker for operators, all being done in IPv6 and what-not...
Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: SRv6, (continued)
- Re: SRv6 Randy Bush (Sep 21)
- RE: SRv6 Keith Medcalf (Sep 21)
- Re: SRv6 Paul Timmins (Sep 22)
- Re: SRv6 Tom Hill (Sep 15)
- RE: SRv6 aaron1 (Sep 15)
- Re: SRv6 Tom Hill (Sep 16)
- Re: SRv6 Andrey Kostin (Sep 18)
- Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 16)
- Re: SRv6 Łukasz Bromirski (Sep 16)