nanog mailing list archives
Re: Partial vs Full tables
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 10:37:29 -0700
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 10:30 AM Tore Anderson <tore () fud no> wrote:
In the end I felt that running in production with the RIB and the FIB perpetually out of sync was too much of a hack, something that I would likely come to regret at a later point in time. That approach never made it out of the lab.
Speak of which, did anyone ever implement FIB compression? I seem to remember the calculations looked really favorable for the leaf node use case (like James') where the router sits at the edge with a small number of more or less equivalent upstream transits. The FIB is the expensive memory. The RIB sits in the cheap part of the hardware. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- RE: Partial vs Full tables, (continued)
- RE: Partial vs Full tables Michael Hare via NANOG (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Chuck Anderson (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka (Jun 09)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka (Jun 09)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Job Snijders (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka (Jun 11)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Tore Anderson (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Yang Yu (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Ryan Woolley (Jun 07)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti (Jun 07)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Baldur Norddahl (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Nick Hilliard (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Joe Greco (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mike Hammett (Jun 08)