nanog mailing list archives
Re: Partial vs Full tables
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:04:48 +0300
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 00:55, Ryan Woolley <rwoolleynanog () gmail com> wrote:
order of 2x) on even very-well-connected routers. This is implemented by Arista in the feature that Yang linked to with the URL containing "fib-compression", but the actual command is better named: "ip fib compression redundant-specifics filter"
I'll take my imagination boat from the dry docks and sail to 2035. Lot of people still run Jericho ANET, it is the new CAT6500 PFC3. DFZ won't fit it anymore without redundant-specifics. Are we at all concerned that someone in the DFZ advertises a minimum set of prefixes needed to force decompression and if we are, how do we protect from it, if we are not, why are we not? -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: Partial vs Full tables, (continued)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Chuck Anderson (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka (Jun 09)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka (Jun 09)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Job Snijders (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka (Jun 11)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Tore Anderson (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Yang Yu (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Ryan Woolley (Jun 07)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti (Jun 07)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Baldur Norddahl (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Nick Hilliard (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Joe Greco (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mike Hammett (Jun 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Josh Hoppes (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Anoop Ghanwani (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti (Jun 08)