nanog mailing list archives
Re: Partial vs Full tables
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 10:04:23 +0200
On 5/Jun/20 18:49, Saku Ytti wrote:
The comparison isn't between full or default, the comparison is between static default or dynamic default. Of course with any default scenario there are more failure modes you cannot route around. But if you need default, you should not want to use dynamic default.
I've found this to be easier to do if your network is reasonably "centralized", i.e., there is one or two (or small handful) of "entry and exit" points. With a stretchy, relatively flat network that neither has a definite entry nor exit point, it's a bit difficult to decide which failure mode should take the default route away. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Partial vs Full tables, (continued)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Tore Anderson (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Tore Anderson (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti (Jun 05)
- RE: Partial vs Full tables Michael Hare via NANOG (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Chuck Anderson (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka (Jun 09)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka (Jun 09)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Job Snijders (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka (Jun 11)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Tore Anderson (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Yang Yu (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Ryan Woolley (Jun 07)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti (Jun 07)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Baldur Norddahl (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 08)