nanog mailing list archives

Re: Partial vs Full tables


From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 19:49:28 +0300

Hey Michael,

On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 19:37, Michael Hare <michael.hare () wisc edu> wrote:

Just because DFZ role device can advertise loopback unconditionally in IGP doesn't mean the DFZ actually has a valid 
eBGP or iBGP session to another DFZ.  It may be contrived but could this not be a possible way to blackhole nearby 
PEs..?

We currently take a full RIB and I am currently doing full FIB.  I'm currently choosing to create a default aggregate 
for downstream default-only connectors based on something like

The comparison isn't between full or default, the comparison is
between static default or dynamic default. Of course with any default
scenario there are more failure modes you cannot route around. But if
you need default, you should not want to use dynamic default.

-- 
  ++ytti


Current thread: