nanog mailing list archives

Re: 5G roadblock: labor


From: Sabri Berisha <sabri () cluecentral net>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 11:02:56 -0800 (PST)

----- On Dec 30, 2019, at 9:16 PM, Brian J. Murrell brian () interlinx bc ca wrote:

Hi,

On Mon, 2019-12-30 at 16:52 -0800, Sabri Berisha wrote:

Who needs more than 640Kb of memory?

We don't know what the future holds. This is an interesting read,
featuring 5g to perform a "hologram" phone call:
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-45009458

While I appreciate that this is just "an example" of why I might need
more than "640Kb of memory" (or more pertinently, more than just a few
MBits/s of phone bandwidth), it's not a realistic/relevant example.

Holographic phone calls?  I barely ever use even video calling of any
sort.  The "picture" portion of the call almost always adds zero value
-- helping my mom load paper in her printer using Duo to actually see
and navigate the physical restrictions of her printer from 300KM away,
aside.

Maybe you're just dating yourself here :) I use video calling on an almost
daily basis with my family living in another country, 9 timezones away. My
daughter can spend hours in her ipad "playing" with grandpa, live on video.

But that was just an example. I'm sure everyone on this list has been in
a professional video presence meeting where you spend the first 10 minutes
getting online, only to have a horrible experience because Joe from HR is
on a shitty DSL link in the middle of nowhere, with his kids crying in the
background. Give Joe more bandwidth and he can find a quiet place without
all the latency/jitter.

One thing I've learned working in this industry for a few years now is that
when you give consumers bandwidth, they'll find a way to use it.

Thanks,

Sabri


Current thread: