nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs
From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 23:46:19 -0400
On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:47:22 -0700, Matt Corallo said:
No one suggested it isnât censorship, youâre bating here. Not deploying enough international capacity is absolutely a form or censorship deployed to great avail - if international sites load too slow, you can skimp on GF appliances!
So.. who was being "censored" when a recent game release caused capacity problems and slow throughput for others? Censorship, *by definition*, is content-dependent. Capacity issues are either byte-count or packet-count dependent, and don't distinguish between pictures of huge rubber duckies in Tiananmen square, and pictures of Mount Kilimanjaro.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Pengxiong Zhu (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Ca By (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Pengxiong Zhu (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Ca By (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Pengxiong Zhu (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Matt Corallo (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Pengxiong Zhu (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Jay Hennigan (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Valdis Klētnieks (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Matt Corallo via NANOG (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Valdis Klētnieks (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Ca By (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Tom Beecher (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Pengxiong Zhu (Apr 01)