nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs
From: Jay Hennigan <jay () west net>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 20:34:25 -0700
On 4/1/20 12:47, Matt Corallo wrote:
No one suggested it isn’t censorship, you’re bating here.
I think you mean baiting, but perhaps not. ;-) -- Jay Hennigan - jay () west net Network Engineering - CCIE #7880 503 897-8550 - WB6RDV
Current thread:
- The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Pengxiong Zhu (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Ca By (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Pengxiong Zhu (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Ca By (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Pengxiong Zhu (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Matt Corallo (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Pengxiong Zhu (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Jay Hennigan (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Valdis Klētnieks (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Matt Corallo via NANOG (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Valdis Klētnieks (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Ca By (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Tom Beecher (Apr 01)
- Re: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs Pengxiong Zhu (Apr 01)