nanog mailing list archives
Re: QoS for Office365
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 18:40:22 +0200
On 2/Jul/19 23:18, Joe Yabuki wrote:
Hi all, How do you deal with QoS for Office365, since the IPs are subject to changes ? How can we mark the trafic while keeping the security (I fear the marking based on TCP/UDP Ports since they are not without an additional risk coming from worms/virus using those ports for example, and doing that directly on the PCs doesn't seem to be the best solution) ?
Funny, I was just answering an internal question about this, last week. As with all things Internet, my stance is if you don't have end-to-end control, trying to do QoS is pointless. That said, I believe it should be possible to apply some kind of meaningful, end-to-end QoS together with Microsoft if you took up one of their Express Route services, given that is considered a private, premium service. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: QoS for Office365, (continued)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari (Jul 09)
- RE: QoS for Office365 Keith Medcalf (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari (Jul 08)
- RE: QoS for Office365 adamv0025 (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Brandon Martin (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- RE: QoS for Office365 Steve Mikulasik via NANOG (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Tom Beecher (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Tom Beecher (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Tom Beecher (Jul 09)