nanog mailing list archives
Re: QoS for Office365
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 18:07:06 +0300
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 17:37, Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
But how did you verify they "worked" as far as actually dropping packets off the correct flow (especially since if you have a high-priority QoS, the flow that loses may be some other customer's flow)?
By congesting queues and verifying expectations to results. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: QoS for Office365, (continued)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Joel Jaeggli (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Jay Ford (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Paul Thornton (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Brian Knight (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Valdis Klētnieks (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari (Jul 09)
- RE: QoS for Office365 Keith Medcalf (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari (Jul 08)
- RE: QoS for Office365 adamv0025 (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Brandon Martin (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- RE: QoS for Office365 Steve Mikulasik via NANOG (Jul 09)