nanog mailing list archives
Re: QoS for Office365
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 16:50:23 +0200
On 9/Jul/19 16:46, Steve Mikulasik wrote:
Even if QoS on the Internet was possible it would be destroyed by everyone marking all their traffic with the highest priority to get the best performance. Tragedy of the commons.
I kind of like the Internet the way it is. The best-effort nature is what allows us to build it in a way that makes it a viable option for global data transport. If all paths on the Internet had to be high-priority, I doubt it'd be a viable project outside of a monopoly or duopoly. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: QoS for Office365, (continued)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari (Jul 09)
- RE: QoS for Office365 Keith Medcalf (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari (Jul 08)
- RE: QoS for Office365 adamv0025 (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Brandon Martin (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- RE: QoS for Office365 Steve Mikulasik via NANOG (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Tom Beecher (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Tom Beecher (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Tom Beecher (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Milhollan (Jul 10)