nanog mailing list archives
Re: QoS for Office365
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 08:25:34 +0200
On 9/Jul/19 01:00, Keith Medcalf wrote:
Using Orifice 342 will hurt you.
Can't choose what my customers like :-). Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: QoS for Office365, (continued)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Jay Ford (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Paul Thornton (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Brian Knight (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Valdis Klētnieks (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari (Jul 09)
- RE: QoS for Office365 Keith Medcalf (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari (Jul 08)
- RE: QoS for Office365 adamv0025 (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Brandon Martin (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- RE: QoS for Office365 Steve Mikulasik via NANOG (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Tom Beecher (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)