nanog mailing list archives
Re: QoS for Office365
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 16:48:29 +0200
On 9/Jul/19 16:37, Valdis Kl ē tnieks wrote:
I'll bite. It's one thing to verify that no routers molested the QoS bits along the packet path. But how did you verify they "worked" as far as actually dropping packets off the correct flow (especially since if you have a high-priority QoS, the flow that loses may be some other customer's flow)?
With some things, you need to have faith until you are given a reason not to. Just like when you are back in 26K and the Captain and his First Officer are up front :-). Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: QoS for Office365, (continued)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Ross Tajvar (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Joel Jaeggli (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Jay Ford (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Paul Thornton (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Brian Knight (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Valdis Klētnieks (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari (Jul 09)
- RE: QoS for Office365 Keith Medcalf (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari (Jul 08)
- RE: QoS for Office365 adamv0025 (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Brandon Martin (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)