nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Experiment
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 04:31:02 +0200
On 23/Jan/19 21:01, James Jun wrote:
Agreed; Please resume the experiment. We're all operators here, and we MUST have confidence that BGP speakers on our network are compliant with protocol specification. Experiments like this are opportunities for a real-life validation of how our devices handle messages that are out of the norm, and help us identify issues. Kudos to researchers by the way, for sending courtesy announcements in advance, and testing against some common platforms available to them (Cisco, Quagga & BIRD) prior to the experiment.
+1. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: BGP Experiment, (continued)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Nick Hilliard (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Filip Hruska (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Owen DeLong (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment William Herrin (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Nikolas Geyer (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment James Jun (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Mark Tinka (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Brian Kantor (Jan 24)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 24)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 24)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 31)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 31)
- Re: BGP Experiment Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)