nanog mailing list archives

Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email?

From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 15 Jan 2019 13:06:42 -0500

In article <35D88832-1031-4979-BD93-47983E18DCCC () consultant com> you write:

-=-=-=-=-=-

Why must there be a hard rule about top posting?


Because we're nerds and whatever made sense in 1983 still make sense
today, because nothing has changed.

By the way, have you changed and memorized all your passwords for this
month yet?

R's,
John

Current thread:

Re: plaintext email?, (continued)
- - - Re: plaintext email? John Levine (Jan 14)
    - Re: plaintext email? Christopher Morrow (Jan 14)
    - Re: plaintext email? bzs (Jan 14)
    - Re: plaintext email? valdis . kletnieks (Jan 14)
    - Re: plaintext email? Richard (Jan 14)
    - Re: plaintext email? Royce Williams (Jan 14)
    - Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? James R Cutler (Jan 15)
    - Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? Tom Beecher (Jan 15)
    - Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? Brian Kantor (Jan 15)
    - Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? Stephen Satchell (Jan 15)
    - Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? John Levine (Jan 15)
    - Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? James R Cutler (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? Tei (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? Stephen Satchell (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? bzs (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? William Herrin (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? James R Cutler (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? bzs (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? Brian J. Murrell (Jan 15)

(Thread continues...)