nanog mailing list archives

Re: plaintext email?

From: Stephen Satchell <list () satchell net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:06:34 -0800

On 1/14/19 9:40 PM, valdis.kletnieks () vt edu wrote:

I'm not away of any languages or writing systems that work from
bottom to top, so that's pretty much everybody.


Typography for at least one pictograph-based language allows for, um,
interesting stunts one can pull to spice up gray matter.  Starting in
the middle of the paragraph and spiraling around, for example.  Nothing
which applies to e-mail, but now you know.

Current thread:

Re: plaintext email?, (continued)
- - - Re: plaintext email? valdis . kletnieks (Jan 14)
    - Re: plaintext email? Richard (Jan 14)
    - Re: plaintext email? Royce Williams (Jan 14)
    - Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? James R Cutler (Jan 15)
    - Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? Tom Beecher (Jan 15)
    - Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? Brian Kantor (Jan 15)
    - Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? Stephen Satchell (Jan 15)
    - Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? John Levine (Jan 15)
    - Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? James R Cutler (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? Tei (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? Stephen Satchell (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? bzs (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? William Herrin (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? James R Cutler (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? bzs (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? Brian J. Murrell (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? Bryan Fields (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? cosmo (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? Aled Morris via NANOG (Jan 15)

(Thread continues...)