nanog mailing list archives

Re: plaintext email?

From: Richard <rgolodner () infratection com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:52:17 -0600


On 1/14/19 11:40 PM, valdis.kletnieks () vt edu wrote:

And if people trimmed the
quoted material so only the parts being replied to are left, there's not much
digging involved.


    That would really be nice, but people are inherintly lazy and will
not invest the few seconds to make reading easier.

    I know if I see a bunch of quotes I am more inclined to delete the
email than read it. Port 26...

Current thread:

Re: plaintext email?, (continued)
- - - Re: plaintext email? James R Cutler (Jan 13)
    - Re: plaintext email? Randy Bush (Jan 14)
    - Re: plaintext email? Christopher Morrow (Jan 14)
    - Re: plaintext email? Randy Bush (Jan 14)
    - Re: plaintext email? Brian Kantor (Jan 14)
    - Re: plaintext email? Steve Atkins (Jan 14)
    - Re: plaintext email? John Levine (Jan 14)
    - Re: plaintext email? Christopher Morrow (Jan 14)
    - Re: plaintext email? bzs (Jan 14)
    - Re: plaintext email? valdis . kletnieks (Jan 14)
    - Re: plaintext email? Richard (Jan 14)
    - Re: plaintext email? Royce Williams (Jan 14)
    - Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? James R Cutler (Jan 15)
    - Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? Tom Beecher (Jan 15)
    - Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? Brian Kantor (Jan 15)
    - Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? Stephen Satchell (Jan 15)
    - Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? John Levine (Jan 15)
    - Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? James R Cutler (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? Tei (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? Stephen Satchell (Jan 15)
    - Re: plaintext email? bzs (Jan 15)

(Thread continues...)