Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge

[Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>]

"Should not". I hear of ISPs fighting it all of the time. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Matt Harris" <matt () netfire net> 
To: nanog () ics-il net 
Cc: brandonwade () yahoo com, "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog () nanog org> 
Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2018 4:48:45 PM 
Subject: Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge 




On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 4:41 PM Mike Hammett < nanog () ics-il net > wrote: 



Maybe this? 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Service_Fund 
https://www.fcc.gov/general/universal-service-fund 
https://www.fcc.gov/general/universal-service 


Kinda crappy they don't spell it out. Well, no, I guess USF would be closer to +-18%. 







USF should not apply to IP transit connectivity wherein the connection between the transit provider and the customer 
does not cross state lines.