Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"?

[Alain Hebert <ahebert () pubnix net>]

<sarcasm>

    Do not forget the "NRA" ways.

    Circular discussions every time an event arise, let it die out after
a few days, and hopefully, nothing change.

-----
Alain Hebert                                ahebert () pubnix net   
PubNIX Inc.        
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770     Beaconsfield, Quebec     H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911  http://www.pubnix.net    Fax: 514-990-9443

On 09/27/16 14:16, Joe Klein wrote:
> The knobs that are available to push adoption of any standard can include
> "Doing nothing", "Educating the community",  "Incentives", "Public
> Shaming", "Loss of business", "Engaging the policy & legal wanks". It seems
> to me the first two options have not moved the ball much.
>
> Must we move the last four to fix the DDOS problem? The last one scares me,
> but the other three might be valid method to move the ball.
>
> Joe Klein
> "Inveniam viam aut faciam"
>
> PGP Fingerprint: 295E 2691 F377 C87D 2841 00C1 4174 FEDF 8ECF 0CC8
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Joe Klein wrote:
> >
> > What would it take to test for BCP38 for a specific AS?
> > Well, you can get people to run https://www.caida.org/projects
> > /spoofer/#software
> >
> > I tried to get OpenWrt to include similar software, on by default, but
> > some people are afraid that they might incur legal action on themselves by
> > doing antispoofing-testing.
> >
> > https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/tf/anti-spoofing might be of
> > interest.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike () swm pp se