nanog mailing list archives
Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"?
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:01:40 +0200 (CEST)
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Mike Jones wrote:
Any network operator should know if their network is blocking it or not without having to deploy active probes across their network.
Err... I was not referring to the operator doing this on the CPEs they provide to their customers. I was referring to enthusiast customers who are running their own CPEs to test if their ISPs are doing anti-spoofing properly or not, and report this information to someone centrally.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Stephen Satchell (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Zbyněk Pospíchal (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Zbyněk Pospíchal (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Zbyněk Pospíchal (Sep 28)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Zbyněk Pospíchal (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mike Jones (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Joe Klein (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Alain Hebert (Sep 28)
- RE: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? White, Andrew (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mike Hammett (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Wesley George (Sep 28)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mike Hammett (Sep 28)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Nick Hilliard (Sep 28)