nanog mailing list archives

Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"?


From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:30:18 +0200 (CEST)

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Zbyněk Pospíchal wrote:

Dne 27.09.16 v 15:17 Mikael Abrahamsson napsal(a):

Hm, so the IX operator looks at packets at the IX (sFlow perhaps), see
who is sending attack packets, and if they're spoofed, this ISP is then
put in "quarantine", ie their IX port is basically now useless.

Definitely not. Try to read first instead of speculations.

The first page was completely devoid of any real technical information until I found the PDF (which from the color choice doesn't even look like a link). (https://www.nix.cz/cs/file/NIX_RULES_FENIX)

It's still not obvious what the FENIX connection is used for from that PDF. It's called "last resort connection". What does that mean?

Apart from that, it looks more like https://www.routingmanifesto.org/ in that organisations that have joined are stating that they will follow some operational guidelines (which make a lot of sense), but it's not that much more technical when it comes to inter-provider traffic.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike () swm pp se


Current thread: