nanog mailing list archives
Re: de-peering for security sake
From: Daniel Corbe <dcorbe () hammerfiber com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 19:50:50 -0500
Let’s just cut off the entirety of the third world instead of having a tangible mitigation plan in place.
On Dec 24, 2015, at 6:44 PM, Colin Johnston <colinj () gt86car org uk> wrote: see http://map.norsecorp.com We really need to ask if China and Russia for that matter will not take abuse reports seriously why allow them to network to the internet ? Colin
Current thread:
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons, (continued)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Lorell Hathcock (Dec 23)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Daniel C. Eckert (Dec 23)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Rob Seastrom (Dec 24)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Baldur Norddahl (Dec 24)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Justin Wilson (Dec 24)
- RE: Broadband Router Comparisons Frank Bulk (Dec 24)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Jason Baugher (Dec 24)
- de-peering for security sake Colin Johnston (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Colin Johnston (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Daniel Corbe (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Stephen Satchell (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Baldur Norddahl (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Lee (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Baldur Norddahl (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Colin Johnston (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Baldur Norddahl (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Colin Johnston (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 25)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Lorell Hathcock (Dec 23)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Clayton Zekelman (Dec 25)