nanog mailing list archives
Re: de-peering for security sake
From: Max Tulyev <maxtul () netassist ua>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 14:41:43 +0200
Come on, keep calm and wait a year: Russia and China will de-peer with all the world for their security (AKA censorship) reasons! ;) On 25.12.15 01:44, Colin Johnston wrote:
see http://map.norsecorp.com We really need to ask if China and Russia for that matter will not take abuse reports seriously why allow them to network to the internet ? Colin
Current thread:
- Re: de-peering for security sake, (continued)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hale (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Matthew Petach (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Damian Menscher via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake James Downs (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Jared Mauch (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hammett (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mark Tinka (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Joel Jaeggli (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Max Tulyev (Dec 25)
- RE: Broadband Router Comparisons Keith Medcalf (Dec 24)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 26)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 27)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 27)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Larry Sheldon (Dec 27)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Stephen Satchell (Dec 27)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Michael Thomas (Dec 27)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Hugo Slabbert (Dec 27)