nanog mailing list archives
Re: Carrier Grade NAT
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:39:14 -0700
On Jul 30, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred () cisco com> wrote:
On Jul 30, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:I will say that if amazon would get off the dime and support IPv6, it would make a significant difference.Someone that works for Amazon once told me that they are primed for it now; the question is whether their customers tick the box appropriately.
Owens-MacBook-Pro:toneAC owendelong$ host www.amazon.com www.amazon.com has address 72.21.215.232 Owens-MacBook-Pro:toneAC owendelong$ host www.google.com www.google.com has address 74.125.239.145 www.google.com has address 74.125.239.146 www.google.com has address 74.125.239.148 www.google.com has address 74.125.239.144 www.google.com has address 74.125.239.147 www.google.com has IPv6 address 2607:f8b0:4005:802::1010 It appears to me that they have failed to tick their own box correctly. I was talking about Amazon, not AWS. Yes, AWS would help too, but in terms of the Alexa list, Amazon would swing the percentage meaningfully. I don’t know to what extent AWS would swing the percentage. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT, (continued)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Corey Touchet (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Chris Adams (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Doug Barton (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT TJ (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Fred Baker (fred) (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Fred Baker (fred) (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Doug Barton (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Mark Andrews (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Matt Palmer (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Gary Buhrmaster (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Mark Andrews (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Ca By (Jul 30)