nanog mailing list archives

Re: Carrier Grade NAT


From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:53:59 -0700

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> wrote:

In message <CAMfXtQwmpEqBk9CKRq2MpW15tRcuicZ_3DoJUsTBAM4=50319A () mail gmail com>, Gary Buhrmaster writes:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:

On Jul 29, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> wrote:
.....
Add to that over half your traffic will switch to IPv6 as long as
the customer has a IPv6 capable CPE.  That's a lot less logging you
need to do from day 1.

That would be nice, but I’m not 100% convinced that it is true.

For the 99.99% of the users who believe that facebook and twitter
*are* the internet, at least facebook is IPv6 enabled.  50.00%(*)!

Yes, I think we can all stipulate that those participating
on this list are different, and have different expectations,
and different capabilities, than those other 99.99%.

Gary

(*) If we are going to make up statistics, four significant
digits looks better than one.

Enable IPv6 at home and measure the traffic.  I did, which is why
I say > 50%.


Orange Poland deployed 464XLAT on mobile and is seeing 62% native IPv6
and 38% NAT64 (slide 26)

http://www.data.proidea.org.pl/plnog/12edycja/day2/track4/01_ipv6_implementation.pdf

I don't have good measurements on this, but i assume the 11 million
464XLAT subscribers on T-Mobile US show a similar profile, possibly
higher due to Netflix now supporting IPv6 on Android.

CB


Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org


Current thread: