nanog mailing list archives
Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls
From: Timothy Morizot <tmorizot () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 21:05:17 -0500
On Apr 17, 2014 7:52 PM, "Matthew Kaufman" <matthew () matthew at> wrote:
While you're at it, the document can explain to admins who have been
burned, often more than once, by the pain of re-numbering internal services at static addresses how IPv6 without NAT will magically solve this problem. If you're worried about that issue, either get your own end user assignment(s) from ARIN or use ULA internally and employ NAT-PT (prefix translation) at the perimeter. That's not even a hard question.
Current thread:
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls, (continued)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls William Herrin (Apr 18)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls Jimmy Hess (Apr 18)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls Lee Howard (Apr 18)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls William Herrin (Apr 18)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls George Herbert (Apr 18)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls Lee Howard (Apr 21)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls George Herbert (Apr 21)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls Brandon Ross (Apr 17)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls Matthew Kaufman (Apr 17)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls Timothy Morizot (Apr 17)
- Thank you Comcast Michael T. Voity (Apr 17)
- Re: Thank you Comcast Mehmet Akcin (Apr 17)
- Re: Thank you Comcast Doug Barton (Apr 17)