Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls

[Sander Steffann <sander () steffann nl>]

Hi Bill,

> Also, I note your draft is entitled "Requirements for IPv6 Enterprise
> Firewalls." Frankly, no "enterprise" firewall will be taken seriously
> without address-overloaded NAT. I realize that's a controversial
> statement in the IPv6 world but until you get past it you're basically
> wasting your time on a document which won't be useful to industry.

I disagree. While there certainly will be organisations that want such a 'feature' it is certainly not a requirement 
for every (I hope most, but I might be optimistic) enterprises.

Cheers,
Sander