Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls

[Matthew Kaufman <matthew () matthew at>]

I think I got you to say "NAT"

Matthew Kaufman

(Sent from my iPhone)

> On Apr 17, 2014, at 7:05 PM, Timothy Morizot <tmorizot () gmail com> wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 17, 2014 7:52 PM, "Matthew Kaufman" <matthew () matthew at> wrote:
> > While you're at it, the document can explain to admins who have been burned, often more than once, by the pain of 
> > re-numbering internal services at static addresses how IPv6 without NAT will magically solve this problem.
>
> If you're worried about that issue, either get your own end user assignment(s) from ARIN or use ULA internally and 
> employ NAT-PT (prefix translation) at the perimeter. That's not even a hard question.