nanog mailing list archives

RE: guys != gender neutral

From: Jamie Bowden <jamie () photon com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:06:31 +0000

From: Otis L. Surratt, Jr. [mailto:otis () ocosa com]

As Owen mentioned saying "human" seems okay and true but then again,
because it's not the norm it raises some question. (Internal thinking
process, "Oh I'm a HUMAN!!!!, well I that is true" then your
temperature gets back to normal) :)


Listen up you prehistoric screwheads...

Jamie

Current thread:

Re: guys != gender neutral, (continued)
- - - Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Joe Greco (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Miles Fidelman (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Miles Fidelman (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Tim Franklin (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Randy Bush (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Owen DeLong (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
    - RE: guys != gender neutral Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Sep 28)
    - RE: guys != gender neutral Jamie Bowden (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Justin M. Streiner (Sep 28)
    - RE: guys != gender neutral Keith Medcalf (Sep 29)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Owen DeLong (Sep 30)
    - Re: really nasty attacks Stephane Bortzmeyer (Sep 27)
    - Re: really nasty attacks Miguel Mata (Sep 27)
    - Re: really nasty attacks Cutler James R (Sep 27)