nanog mailing list archives

Re: really nasty attacks

From: Cutler James R <james.cutler () consultant com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:39:40 -0400

On Sep 27, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai net> wrote:


On Sep 27, 2012, at 11:34 , Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr> wrote:

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:55:58AM -0600, Miguel Mata <mmata () intercom com sv> wrote 
a message of 30 lines which said:

Guys,


No gals on NANOG?


Many.  Although in fairness, some people use "guys" in a gender-neutral manner.


See, for example, "Sesame Street".

Current thread:

Re: guys != gender neutral, (continued)
- - - Re: guys != gender neutral Owen DeLong (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
    - RE: guys != gender neutral Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Sep 28)
    - RE: guys != gender neutral Jamie Bowden (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Justin M. Streiner (Sep 28)
    - RE: guys != gender neutral Keith Medcalf (Sep 29)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Owen DeLong (Sep 30)
    - Re: really nasty attacks Stephane Bortzmeyer (Sep 27)
    - Re: really nasty attacks Miguel Mata (Sep 27)
    - Re: really nasty attacks Cutler James R (Sep 27)